I get a pretty routine amount of correspondence regarding cartridge selection for Alaska hunting and a typical query goes something like this..."I've got a .308 but I want to go moose hunting..." or some variation on that theme. Typically, someone will have a rifle they've used elsewhere but after reading a bunch of Internet chit chat they have become convinced that their deer gun is suddenly inadequate for hunting in the North. They might come to that conclusion through a variety of reasons- moose, bears, long range, or some combination of the above but all come to the conclusion that the .308...is somehow...inadequate.
On the other hand, I'm pretty plugged into the Alaska hunting community and am friends with a large number of very successful hunters. I was treated to a photo last week of a couple of friends of mine- a married couple- who explore much of Alaska and hunt extensively. The photo was from their spring bear hunt on Kodiak Island chasing the island's world famous brown bears. I'll not spoil the story should they ever decide to tell it and, besides, this story is about the .308 Winchester. Suffice to say the archetypical animal that inspires thousands to purchase true elephant guns in their pursuit fell to a single broadside shot from a .308 Winchester. And this couple are not just some lucky fools who happened to make it work once. They hunt bears, goats, sheep, moose, caribou and everything else on a near constant basis. Hubby is something of a rifle crank like I am but the wife is a "dyed in the wool" fan of the .308 in her bobbed Kimber Montana. It's the rifle she shoots the most, shoots the best and has bagged about one or five of everything there is to shoot here. Including now, a nine and one-half foot Kodiak bear...on the heels a 62" moose a couple years ago and a mountain goat last year.
Putting the 180 grain bullet at a plodding 2600 feet per second where it goes is much more important that a heavier bullet or a faster bullet. The fact that the world's most popular hunting cartridge is now the .308 isn't likely an accident either although worldwide acceptance isn't a wholly deciding factor alone- look at the AK47...easily the most common rifle on the planet with little to recommend it.
I'll digress....
I've had a very long association with the .308 and have taken a sizable number of animals with it, including my nicest caribou- a true old giant of a beast as far as caribou go. I wandered away from the .308 some time back, partially out of sheer boredom but I could easily go back to it as an all around rifle. I would do so with total confidence too. I've had .308s from Remington, Kimber, Winchester and of course, my Steyr. There's nothing I wouldn't hunt in Alaska with any of them. I handled a wonderful Sako Carbonlight a few months back and while the price tag could induce a coronary....I could happily hunt with it until the end of my hunting career and never look back.
There are plenty of old gun hands who dismiss the .308 as "inferior" or "weak" or any other such nonsense claims. Reading some of the older writers, they claim it's only good for Girl Scouts or to cycle through the M14 shooting diminutive Communists in some far off land. It was poppycock then and it still is.
I'll not bore the reader with the tale of the .308- that history is well documented- but we'd do well to remember that the ballistics that made the storied reputation of the .30-06 are exactly the ballistics offered in modern .308 ammunition. A 150gr at 2800, a 165 at 2700 and a 180gr at 2600. Modern .30-06 ammunition will typically get about an additional 100 feet per second added to those figures in sporter length barrels. It's my experience that those 100 fps do exactly nothing in terms of greater wounding or trajectory over typical distances. The bonus is that the .308 is available in some really great rifles- of particular interest are the super light rifles and carbines like those from Kimber and Sako. There is not a real advantage in picking the .308 in a 9 pound rifle.
However, a 6 pound rifle is a completely different matter and a short action will typically drop 6-8 oz from the weight of the action. It's no trick to get a hunting ready rifle in .308 under 7 pounds and not unusual to get under 6 pounds. The .308 case is a model of efficiency and gets full ballistic potential from barrels as short as 20". A svelte little carbine like the Sako Finnlight or Kimber Adirondack might give you a tangible advantage as you climb through 5000' or whack your way through some alder choked hell. That's a much more tangible thing to consider than some arbitrary numbers in a ballistic table.
We'd also do well to remember that while a certain level of power is desirable, ability to shoot proficiently is mandatory. Having cool nerves and utmost confidence in your ability will serve you better than the latest "uber magnum" headstamp. Knowing where to shoot something and that the bullet will hit what you aim at is far more important than any other factor in killing animals. There's a 9.5 foot Kodiak bear that learned that last week... and we should too.
Random musings on my favorite pastime- being outside. Also included is the occasional venture into other topics.
Sunday, May 15, 2016
Friday, March 25, 2016
The Contents of a Man’s Pockets...(a Rant)
(Author's note: this is the closest thing you'll get to men's fashion advice in this column...)
There seems to be a movement afoot wherein grown men become
very conscious about the contents of their pockets. The movement is called EDC,
which is an acronym for Every Day Carry. While I will wholeheartedly agree that
grown men typically have responsibilities that require the lugging about of
certain material goods, the movement has taken on an air of man-boy dress up. I
get that adult life can indeed take some very weird turns, and as a good Boy
Scout you should “Be Prepared”. Sometimes that train of thought can run on some
pretty bizarre tracks.
Case in point, in researching one of the many blogs
dedicated to EDC, readers of the blog take some sort of photo of their “EDC
Kit” and post it up for other readers to comment upon. One thing that struck
me, is that most of the photos had far more crap in them than most folks carry
on a daily basis. One sample had a full size 1911 handgun, a spare mag, a small
revolver, two flashlights, and (no kidding) three knives as well as one
multi-tool. I doubt very seriously any grown man packs that much crap on a
daily basis going about a workaday life- even a workaday life that might
involve physical violence. One thing curiously absent was a key ring. Given the
presumption that the poster was indeed a grown man, one would assume you’d have
some level of responsibility for managing a key of some sort. Close to 10
pounds of steel rummaging around in your pockets or belt and no key to a house,
car, office, etc. I call Walter Mitty on this one.
One of the things that also struck me strange is the
counterpoise to the entire EDC movement, which is The Minimalists. It is not unusual for these folks to not carry much at
all-no watch, no wedding band, only a tiny sliver of aluminum or leather that
holds a driver’s license and a couple of credit cards. No cash, certainly
nothing in the way of a firearm, no pocketknife. About the only thing for
certain is a giant, honking smart phone which might very well replace a full
sized computer in their home. It is as if any sort of material good is a
physical encumbrance that goes beyond what is acceptable. A wallet or watch
might slow them down or tax their stamina beyond the limit. I’ve even seen ads
for a new smartphone technology that eliminates the need for a credit or ATM
card- your phone can be used to get cash or pay for purchases directly. Sounds
like a complete disaster.
So here is my view from middle age in my not so humble
opinion on what every grown man ought to carry on a daily basis.
The required…
1.
Wallet- if you’re a grown man, you need a
wallet. Period. You’ll need to carry some form of ID, most likely an ATM and
credit card, insurance card, a photo of the family for the married man (or a
list of phone numbers for the bachelor). In my youth, I’d sure hate to trust
the number of a knock out redhead I just met to some digital ether. And
speaking of phone numbers, a grown man ought to have a business card or two in
there. Nothing fancy, but opportunity strikes when you least expect it. A
wallet also needs to be leather. A nylon number that closes with Velcro is fine
if you’re in junior high- adulthood is different. A well-made wallet can outlast you. A wallet
with a chain attached to your belt? Do I really need to go there?
2.
Cash- to go in that wallet. There is nothing
that points to adolescence like being financially naked. There is simply no
excuse for a grown man to be rolling around with just a couple of bucks. While
I’ll admit there is a practical limit here; a man should be able to buy a tire,
buy dinner, and buy a few groceries or a tank of gas without whipping out the plastic.
A surprising number of life’s minor disasters can be readily solved by the
application of a couple of Benjamins. Nothing says “adult” like paying the
dinner tab (and the tip) with a single bill of currency in the check and
walking out of the restaurant.
3.
Watch- a grown man is going to have some level
of responsibility. Part of that responsibility involves getting to places on
time. Punctuality is the basic level of respect you give other people- give it
and expect it from others. I know your dang phone has a clock on it, I get it;
but a man looking at his watch and a man looking at his phone portrays two very
different messages. I can subtlety (or not so subtlety) glance at my watch and
frown at some chatty Kathy to let them know that I value my time and have more
pressing matters to attend to. Looking at your phone just makes you one more of
zombiefied masses so common today.
And
speaking of a watch, it needs to do two things- tell the time and tell the date.
Gadgetry need not apply. Calculator watches were cool when you were a kid and
there is simply no need for a watch with an altimeter and GPS to keep you
moving smoothly through your day. A giant dive watch is only appropriate if
you’re a professional diver or a submarine captain (you’re neither so don’t).
The construction of a watch is also important. A jewel encrusted golden
monstrosity identifies you as a cheesy used car salesman or some other similar
over-compensator trying desperately to impress when you bring nothing of value
to the table. A plastic digital watch is practical and frugal- but as a man of
some means you get some leeway here- a stainless or titanium watch is always a
good move and appropriate everywhere in all situations. A good watch is an
investment, spend some of that hard earned money and you only need one. (Ladies,
a nice classic watch is the perfect gift).
4.
Jewelry. Unless we’re talking a wedding band,
don’t. Class rings, frat rings, etc. are a nice memento but have no place in an
adult wardrobe. In a similar vein, bracelets, chains, pinky rings, etc. make
you look like a complete douche. A man’s jewelry is a wedding band and a watch.
Period. And speaking of wedding bands- an appropriate wedding band is plain. A
woman’s engagement ring and wedding band is a sign of prowess and status. A
man’s wedding band is your wife marking her territory, no need for flash here.
Metal type isn’t particularly important; gold is traditional, platinum is
really too soft for a man’s ring and titanium and other exotic materials are
just fine and perhaps more practical. The newer “action bands” made of plastic
or silicon are tacky. If you’re engaged in high risk activities like sky
diving, MMA fighting or running a machine mill where a ring presents a hazard…just
take it off. Tattooed wedding bands? Just no.
5.
Pocket knife- carry a dang knife…you are not a
child. Unless you’re on a plane then you should have a knife in your pocket.
There is no need to go wild here. A knife is man’s first tool and contrary to
all the shrinking violets out there- a knife is a terrible weapon. As a grown
man you will undoubtedly have to open mail, open a box, cut a rope or some
other similar task that requires a blade. A giant knife is generally not
required, after all I’ve butchered a bull moose with a 3” folding knife and
bigger would have been a hindrance rather than a help. Multi-tools can be handy
but on most folks they look as nerdy as packing a shortwave radio. A good
quality knife says a lot about the man carrying it and the world is chock full
of perfectly acceptable ones. Oh, it should be sharp, a dull knife carries a
message too… a bad one.
6.
Key ring- as a grown up you likely have some
keys. You’re probably in a senior enough position to warrant a key to the
office or other workplace. You should have a key to the house or apartment.
Despite the proclivity of automakers to drift toward keyless cars, most of you
will need an automotive key, depending on locale- you’ll have a post office box
key. A simple key ring is fine. They’re keys, not a fashion statement. Needless
to say, you should avoid nonsense key fobs like fart noise makers and what not.
A functional key fob like an LED button light is totally ok. If your key ring
looks like you work at the county jail, you might need to rethink what you’re
packing around. Needless to say, a beer bottle opener on your key ring
identifies you as a juvenile who lacks either an imagination or a rudimentary
understanding of physics.
7.
Phone- adult life will almost certainly require
you to carry a phone in the modern era. Consider it a necessary evil or a minor
inconvenience at best. The zombie hordes run around all day staring into their
phones oblivious to everything around them. That’s stupid- while rare, if you
walk around in Condition White all the time someone might cut off your head and
put it on a stick. Be present where you are and for God’s sake, don’t look at
your stupid phone while being addressed by your superiors. It’s rude, and they
won’t forget it.
As an aside on the phone: Texting.
Texts are for limited communications… like “Can you pick up a gallon of milk?”
with the response of ”Will do.” That’s texting appropriately. If you need to
carry on a long discourse with several decision points just call them- you have
a phone in your hand after all. The younger generation seems to have forgotten
that phones are for talking. I’m in the minority here, but I hate texting. It’s
the lowest echelon of human communication.
The maybe….
8.
A pistol- lots of fluff on this one. Some folks
habitually carry a firearm and others do so vocationally. I’ve got no issue
with either provided it’s kept within the limits of reasonable. I’ve seen a
number of folks packing heat in the open; it’s legal here but it still makes
you look like a mouth breather man-boy playing livestock movement technicians
and indigenous peoples (unless you also happen to be wearing a uniform). A gun
is not a fashion or political statement, and anyone who tries to make one
either needs a serious butt kicking.
Packing heat should be a serious and discreet
activity for a lot of good reasons and that means concealed. That would favor
smaller weapons and given the popularity of concealed carry in the modern era,
makers produce a whole host of suitable pieces. A look at someone’s daily carry
gives you a good idea of their occupation, their level of paranoia, or more likely
their proclivity to fantasies about zombies and foreign invasions. Most of the
opinion on knives and watches translates here- too big is bad, too gadgety is
bad, too tiny is bad. If you find it required to pack a service pistol, a
reload and a smaller revolver on top of that I would suggest either a new job,
a shrink or a new zip code.
The “Just say no”….
There is a never ending list of
paraphernalia that folks carry around. I’ve seen tactical flashlights on a lot
of lists- could be handy in a given situation but most likely not in everyday
life. I’ve seen some pretty esoteric stuff too- like a 6” long titanium prybar.
I have to wonder how often a guy might suddenly need a prybar without warning
and if you did how well a 6” version would work. I’ve also seen a whole host of
miniaturized tools. As a guy who’s done a lot of mechanical work, substitutions
for actual tools usually just spell disaster in the form of busted knuckles and
stripped bolts. I know the appeal is that you’ll suddenly need a 10mm wrench
and your savvy preparations will save the day when you effect whatever repair
with a mini tool you just happened to have in your pocket. Truth be told,
you’ll spend $50 for a worthless titanium piece of stock with a 10mm EDM hole
in it that you’ll forget about every single time you need a 10mm wrench. It
will then live in the bottom of a drawer or your glove box forever.
I’m a wilderness guy and have a
whole kit of goods that I take there. On a lot of folk’s lists I saw a lot of
fire-making kits, compasses, small axes, and one guy claimed to EDC a breakdown
spear point. Given that most of these folks are straight up urban cube rats, I
find it hard to believe that on the way to the office they’ll suddenly need a
friction fire, a fresh cut sapling to make a fish spear and to navigate cross
country out of the blue. There’s prepared and then there’s out of touch with
reality.
To end my rant, I get that modern
life has stripped a lot out of masculinity. Being a man who makes his living
staring into an illuminated rectangle all day certainly doesn’t have a
satisfying snap like gunning down big game and roasting its flesh over an open
flame does. I even get that in today’s precarious times that the downward tug
of a pound and a half of stainless steel .45 automatic on your hip sure does
ease the apprehension about driving through certain parts of town. We’re men,
it is part of our ethos to be the prepared, to be the fixer, the problem
solver. For many of us, that’s a part of life that is sorely lacking. But
buying a whole bunch of bespoke gadgets to fill your pockets with won’t fill
the void, for that you need confidence and you earn that with callouses.
Tuesday, March 15, 2016
Snowmachines...more Dangerous than a Loaded Gun.
An interesting few days in the news regarding snow machines (snowmobiles for you Canadians and other illiterate types)...just kidding, snow machine is a fixed part of the Alaska lexicon, other places? Not so much.
But I digress-
In a widely circulated story- an intoxicated man hit two Iditarod teams in two seperate incidents over the weekend killing a dog and injuring three more. In another breaking story, husband of former Alaska governor Sarah Palin, Todd Palin, is in intensive care after being mangled by a snow machine over the weekend as well.
But those are just a couple of stories that achieved circulation due to the notoriety of those involved. Just about every week some anonymous Alaskan will strain a machine through the trees at high speed or ride one through a hole in the ice or simply get stranded out in the toolies..some of the worst off will trigger an avalanche. Some get rescued, some get medi-vaced, and some get buried. Some just never get found. The really stupid add booze to an already precarious situation.
Bottom line, snow machines as a mechanism of injury know few peers. Be careful out there folks.
Sunday, March 6, 2016
Archery as Therapy for the Malaise of Middle Age
I'll say at the outset that this is pretty different for me. I've recently taken up archery and have been enjoying it...well, the point of this piece is that it is more than enjoyment. It's therapy.
Between my professional life as a project manager/planner, an organizational restructuring project, technical writing, a pretty well received op-ed, academic concerns and venting my spleen on political matters in print- it's left my nerves frayed.
While I'll not bore the reader with an exhaustive discussion of my work life; being the H.M.I.C. of dramatic change is not easy. People resist even positive change and are deeply suspicious of even the purest motives that come with evidence. Change that doesn't come wrapped in such gilded bona fides- well, you can guess. The end of the work day usually ends with a long sigh. On top of that, there is the usual technical writing that accompanies that sort of work. I like it. Sort of. It's writing, but it's dry and devoid of character by design. I've previously compared it to working in a dusty barn- try as you might you can't help but choke on it. It makes me yearn for the days I worked in construction- at the end of the day my body was tired but my mind was clear. My current effort entails sitting on my ass for ten hours and leaving too tired to think.
While I'll not go into a political discussion (it's neither the intent nor scope of this blog) I will say that the current contentious environment is taxing on the mind. I'm much too old to resign the political arena to my elders and much too young to resign myself to death before I feel the effects of the decision making of the political class. I've written, briefly about it here and there, but I've had to take on the role of outside observer lest it make me absolutely crazy. I did write an opinion piece about the current public land debacle that got picked up by the Anchorage paper and was pretty well received. It was widely circulated on conservation list servers and I felt pretty good about that. Still, in politics it seems like I worry excessively about tempests I can do little about.
Which brings me to archery.
Coming home with a bunch of conflicting thoughts bouncing around inside my head isn't really the best way to end the day. When I pick up the bow, those thoughts get quiet. The less contentious get forgotten. Pretty soon I'm not focusing on rate of return or earned value management or delegate assignments or state house bills or much of anything else of that ilk. I'm focusing on compressing 70 pounds of draw weight energy and concentrating it onto the tip of a 30" long carbon fiber arrow. Then unleashing that energy into an equation that is both relatively simple and damnably complex with the hope of driving an arrow into a spot the size of a tennis ball some 30 yards away. And I do it over, and over, and over.
While I know nothing about "zen", I do know a little about fly-fishing. The physics are there in plain sight but do the slightest thing wrong and the whole system collapses. With the bow, drop your string arm elbow and your point of impact radically changes. Change your anchor and you may not even hit the target. Forget to open your grip and you might sail an arrow into the ethereal beyond. Shooting well requires a complete focus on what you're doing. As I've learned, if you're shooting the bow and thinking about something back at the office you'll soon be thinking about where your $12 arrow just went.
When you're at full draw you had better be all in the here and now. Unlike rifle shooting, the bow requires a presence. With the rifle, everything except my breath, the trigger and the crosshairs goes away. With the bow I have to be acutely aware of my feet, my back, my arms, my neck, the angles of my legs, the pressure of the release against the back wall. I can break a rifle down into pure math- feet per second, ballistic drop, foot-pounds of energy, time of flight. I can't do that with a bow. That's why bow ads and reviews are so full of subjective language. Non-sensical words like "shootability", "smooth" and "forgiving". Even the mathematical standard for how fast a bow will shoot, IBO speed, has almost zero bearing on how fast it will shoot in the real word. It is delightfully frustrating.
My job as a planner requires that I spend a lot of my day in the future and my endeavors as a writer usually entails a substantial dwelling on the past. As an archer however- the discipline demands being in the present.
And that's just what I needed.
Between my professional life as a project manager/planner, an organizational restructuring project, technical writing, a pretty well received op-ed, academic concerns and venting my spleen on political matters in print- it's left my nerves frayed.
While I'll not bore the reader with an exhaustive discussion of my work life; being the H.M.I.C. of dramatic change is not easy. People resist even positive change and are deeply suspicious of even the purest motives that come with evidence. Change that doesn't come wrapped in such gilded bona fides- well, you can guess. The end of the work day usually ends with a long sigh. On top of that, there is the usual technical writing that accompanies that sort of work. I like it. Sort of. It's writing, but it's dry and devoid of character by design. I've previously compared it to working in a dusty barn- try as you might you can't help but choke on it. It makes me yearn for the days I worked in construction- at the end of the day my body was tired but my mind was clear. My current effort entails sitting on my ass for ten hours and leaving too tired to think.
While I'll not go into a political discussion (it's neither the intent nor scope of this blog) I will say that the current contentious environment is taxing on the mind. I'm much too old to resign the political arena to my elders and much too young to resign myself to death before I feel the effects of the decision making of the political class. I've written, briefly about it here and there, but I've had to take on the role of outside observer lest it make me absolutely crazy. I did write an opinion piece about the current public land debacle that got picked up by the Anchorage paper and was pretty well received. It was widely circulated on conservation list servers and I felt pretty good about that. Still, in politics it seems like I worry excessively about tempests I can do little about.
Which brings me to archery.
Coming home with a bunch of conflicting thoughts bouncing around inside my head isn't really the best way to end the day. When I pick up the bow, those thoughts get quiet. The less contentious get forgotten. Pretty soon I'm not focusing on rate of return or earned value management or delegate assignments or state house bills or much of anything else of that ilk. I'm focusing on compressing 70 pounds of draw weight energy and concentrating it onto the tip of a 30" long carbon fiber arrow. Then unleashing that energy into an equation that is both relatively simple and damnably complex with the hope of driving an arrow into a spot the size of a tennis ball some 30 yards away. And I do it over, and over, and over.
While I know nothing about "zen", I do know a little about fly-fishing. The physics are there in plain sight but do the slightest thing wrong and the whole system collapses. With the bow, drop your string arm elbow and your point of impact radically changes. Change your anchor and you may not even hit the target. Forget to open your grip and you might sail an arrow into the ethereal beyond. Shooting well requires a complete focus on what you're doing. As I've learned, if you're shooting the bow and thinking about something back at the office you'll soon be thinking about where your $12 arrow just went.
When you're at full draw you had better be all in the here and now. Unlike rifle shooting, the bow requires a presence. With the rifle, everything except my breath, the trigger and the crosshairs goes away. With the bow I have to be acutely aware of my feet, my back, my arms, my neck, the angles of my legs, the pressure of the release against the back wall. I can break a rifle down into pure math- feet per second, ballistic drop, foot-pounds of energy, time of flight. I can't do that with a bow. That's why bow ads and reviews are so full of subjective language. Non-sensical words like "shootability", "smooth" and "forgiving". Even the mathematical standard for how fast a bow will shoot, IBO speed, has almost zero bearing on how fast it will shoot in the real word. It is delightfully frustrating.
My job as a planner requires that I spend a lot of my day in the future and my endeavors as a writer usually entails a substantial dwelling on the past. As an archer however- the discipline demands being in the present.
And that's just what I needed.
Saturday, February 20, 2016
Something New...or Strings and Sticks and Assorted Pokey Things
My wife generally observes my birthday by dropping me off kicking me to the curb out of a moving vehicle in front of the sporting goods store with instructions to "go buy something." If it's not been a very good year, i might walk out with a box of shells or a pack. A good year has seen a nice rifle or two, a shotgun and a new pair of binos. Since I'm firmly ensconced in my "middle youth" I generally just skip intermediary steps and buy what I want from the outset since I'm likely going there anyway.
I've hemmed and hawed about archery for a couple of years now. I haven't shot a bow even semi-seriously in decades but it is something I've been wanting to try again for no particular reason other than it is a facet of hunting I've got little experience in. Alaska doesn't really have much in the way of a "bow season" the way the Lower 48 does, but we do have a few areas that are relegated to archery only and some fantastic tags there.
This year, I got kicked to the curb outside the archery shop. Which was pretty nice....so expect to see some archery content in the future. As of now, I've been shooting it for a couple of weeks and managed to take the online portion of my IBEP certification (required in Alaska for bowhunts). The bow is a Mathews No-Cam HTX, which came highly recommended by my archery oriented friends and I have to admit- it's been far easier to pick up than I imagined.
I've hemmed and hawed about archery for a couple of years now. I haven't shot a bow even semi-seriously in decades but it is something I've been wanting to try again for no particular reason other than it is a facet of hunting I've got little experience in. Alaska doesn't really have much in the way of a "bow season" the way the Lower 48 does, but we do have a few areas that are relegated to archery only and some fantastic tags there.
This year, I got kicked to the curb outside the archery shop. Which was pretty nice....so expect to see some archery content in the future. As of now, I've been shooting it for a couple of weeks and managed to take the online portion of my IBEP certification (required in Alaska for bowhunts). The bow is a Mathews No-Cam HTX, which came highly recommended by my archery oriented friends and I have to admit- it's been far easier to pick up than I imagined.
Saturday, January 30, 2016
The 7WSM.... An Unloved Cartridge Bargain.
I must admit that in years past, I was never a fan of the 7mm bore. I had mostly .30 calibers and a couple of .270s. It was a prejudice that really wasn't grounded in anything...just a notion floating around in my brain. I've written a couple times now about the 7-08 and how we've found good success with it. I've also written a couple of times about inexpensive rifles that just perform far beyond what their meager prices should warrant. I've also written about the innate Scot's thriftiness that I've inherited... little did I know that all three of those things would come together in a rifle.
I was perusing one of the community yard sale boards and came across a rifle. A Winchester Stainless Classic. The asking price wasn't out of line, but it was chambered in the red headed stepchild of the WSM family...the 7WSM. Same concept and case as the rest of the WSMs...basically a 7mm Remington Mag in a short action- 140gr@3200, 150gr@3100 and 160gr@3000fps. On the ammunition market, the 7WSM has proven about as popular as the clap.
I've truly enjoyed the .300WSM but the7WSM in this rifle simply left me cold. I just ignored it.
After seeing the rifle hang around for a bit and the owner drop the price a couple of times...I thought that the rifle had potential as a donor for a custom .300WSM at some future date. So I called the owner and basically said something to the effect of, "I have no interest in a 7WSM. I'll give you $400 for the rifle so I can take it apart for a project." I was a little surprised that he bit, and I was the owner of a "new to me" Winchester.
When I got the rifle home I cleaned it and discovered that it likely didn't have more than a couple boxes of ammo down the bore. Everything internally was essentially new and the exterior only had a couple of handling marks. Big whoop- when I'm done, it will have a bunch of handling marks. The trigger was a horrendous 10lbs or more and the hot glue that Winchester puts on the adjustment nut was still there. The black plastic stock had no bedding and full contact with the barrel channel. The trigger was easy enough to fix since it was the old style "Pre '64" trigger that everyone loves- a nice 3.5lb pull was easily achieved with a lighter and two open end wrenches. The stock would require a lot more to fix but I thought- what the heck, I'll shoot it "as-is" and see what it will do.
I rounded up a one piece DNZ scope mount and mounted an older Zeiss Conquest 3-9x40 that I had laying about. The scope put the rifle at 8.5lbs on the nose. I took it to the range.
Three rounds downrange did this-
That's three rounds of 140gr Winchester "Ballistic Silvertip" at 100 yards. Fired off a shaky folding table over a backpack stuffed with a jacket.
1.25"....that'll kill stuff as far as I'll shoot at it.
I'm thinking that I can work with this one and get it to group better by using a better bench and working on the bedding but that's largely just an ego booster. In the field, this gun over a pack from the top of a pressure ridge would kill a caribou from a very long way off.
Not bad for a $400 rifle wearing a used scope. If you can find one, not such a bad deal when compared to what else you can buy at that price.
I was perusing one of the community yard sale boards and came across a rifle. A Winchester Stainless Classic. The asking price wasn't out of line, but it was chambered in the red headed stepchild of the WSM family...the 7WSM. Same concept and case as the rest of the WSMs...basically a 7mm Remington Mag in a short action- 140gr@3200, 150gr@3100 and 160gr@3000fps. On the ammunition market, the 7WSM has proven about as popular as the clap.
I've truly enjoyed the .300WSM but the7WSM in this rifle simply left me cold. I just ignored it.
After seeing the rifle hang around for a bit and the owner drop the price a couple of times...I thought that the rifle had potential as a donor for a custom .300WSM at some future date. So I called the owner and basically said something to the effect of, "I have no interest in a 7WSM. I'll give you $400 for the rifle so I can take it apart for a project." I was a little surprised that he bit, and I was the owner of a "new to me" Winchester.
When I got the rifle home I cleaned it and discovered that it likely didn't have more than a couple boxes of ammo down the bore. Everything internally was essentially new and the exterior only had a couple of handling marks. Big whoop- when I'm done, it will have a bunch of handling marks. The trigger was a horrendous 10lbs or more and the hot glue that Winchester puts on the adjustment nut was still there. The black plastic stock had no bedding and full contact with the barrel channel. The trigger was easy enough to fix since it was the old style "Pre '64" trigger that everyone loves- a nice 3.5lb pull was easily achieved with a lighter and two open end wrenches. The stock would require a lot more to fix but I thought- what the heck, I'll shoot it "as-is" and see what it will do.
I rounded up a one piece DNZ scope mount and mounted an older Zeiss Conquest 3-9x40 that I had laying about. The scope put the rifle at 8.5lbs on the nose. I took it to the range.
Three rounds downrange did this-
That's three rounds of 140gr Winchester "Ballistic Silvertip" at 100 yards. Fired off a shaky folding table over a backpack stuffed with a jacket.
1.25"....that'll kill stuff as far as I'll shoot at it.
I'm thinking that I can work with this one and get it to group better by using a better bench and working on the bedding but that's largely just an ego booster. In the field, this gun over a pack from the top of a pressure ridge would kill a caribou from a very long way off.
Not bad for a $400 rifle wearing a used scope. If you can find one, not such a bad deal when compared to what else you can buy at that price.
Saturday, January 23, 2016
.300 Winchester Short Magnum....15 years of Short and Fat.
We've just seen the end of S.H.O.T., the Shooting Hunting and Outdoor Trade Show. In the U.S., this is the most likely venue for new product introductions from almost everyone in the industry. While I greeted the offerings this year with a giant yawn- consisting mostly of AR variants and pieces parts- this wasn't always the case.
Way back in 2001, the folks at Winchester introduced the .300 Winchester Short Magnum in the midst of what some folks have called the Second Magnum Craze. The introduction followed the typical Winchester playbook- great hype in a full court press of magazine articles and a marketing blitzkrieg. One could not open a sporting or shooting magazine without reading an article extolling the virtues of the "Short Magnum".
Most of it was pure baloney.
Claims of reduced recoil in the form of "reduced ejecta" sounded just science-y enough to be plausible. Claims of velocities exceeding the well established .300 Winchester Magnum were everywhere you looked. Hyper-ventilation over the joys of a shorter bolt throw were shouted from the heavens. We were treated to a plethora of dead critter photos in print, apparently only possible from the new cartridge. In those days, Winchester was a behemoth in the industry and new guns and ammo sold pretty well.
It didn't take long for the ever-cynical shooting community to unleash its own torrent of hyperbole. I was told point blank by a savvy rifleman that the cartridge was doomed to obscurity and cash spent on such a rifle was practically flushed. Work with a chronograph soon revealed that Winchester's data had a bit of "blue sky" in it as well (not the first time for that one either) and most folks with production guns with 24" barrels were getting 2900 fps and a bit of change with the 180gr bullets, far short of the promised 3100 fps. Most folks who pulled the trigger on one got belted with enough recoil to make claims of "reduced recoil" sound like the complete rubbish it is. According to a number of Internet Bwanas, the rebated rim practically guaranteed your mauling at the paws of charismatic megafauna when your gun jammed. Some early rifle had feeding issues that did nothing to alleviate those concerns either.
In those days, you could log into your favorite forum or BBS (remember that!) and read pages of technical minutiae from both sides and when Winchester introduced their follow on family of short cartridges in .270, 7mm, and .325, as well as Remington's competing "short mags".... things kinda went tilt. Suddenly the market had a glut of cartridges that all, pretty much, did the exact same thing.
What both sides of the debate missed was pretty much everything.
I came along to the .300WSM in 2006, when I (somewhat reluctantly) purchased a rifle I was in love with. My rifle was a lightweight.... a 6.5 pound rifle for carrying into high and rocky places. I wanted something with enough oomph for the odd grizzly or moose and with enough reach for Dall sheep and caribou over open country. Ammo was fairly expensive compared to .30-06 fodder, but in all reality- most hunters just don't shoot their rifles all that much and with recoil numbers in the 25-29 foot pound range...don't really want to.
A string of dead critters later and the .300WSM did not disappoint. Since then, every big game animal I've taken with one exception has been with the cartridge. I've now had 3 of the WSM family and just recently purchased a Winchester 7WSM for eventual custom work. My favorite rifle shoots 180 grain bullets into 3/4" at 2925fps with boring regularity. None of the WSM rifles I've had exhibited feeding issues and every one of my acquaintances who have WSMs do not regret the purchase. They just happily head to the field and kill stuff.
While it may sound like I'm a fanboy, I'm not. The cartridge is, what it is- nothing less or more. A very effective cartridge that gets near .300 Win Magnum performance in a handy sized short action rifle. It's now 15 years old and pretty near ubiquitous on sporting good retailer's shelves and cataloged by almost everyone making guns and ammunition. I expect that it will not be teetering on obsolescence any time soon. It's not magic either- it's just a brass bottle for holding gunpowder and a pretty good one at that.
Way back in 2001, the folks at Winchester introduced the .300 Winchester Short Magnum in the midst of what some folks have called the Second Magnum Craze. The introduction followed the typical Winchester playbook- great hype in a full court press of magazine articles and a marketing blitzkrieg. One could not open a sporting or shooting magazine without reading an article extolling the virtues of the "Short Magnum".
Most of it was pure baloney.
Claims of reduced recoil in the form of "reduced ejecta" sounded just science-y enough to be plausible. Claims of velocities exceeding the well established .300 Winchester Magnum were everywhere you looked. Hyper-ventilation over the joys of a shorter bolt throw were shouted from the heavens. We were treated to a plethora of dead critter photos in print, apparently only possible from the new cartridge. In those days, Winchester was a behemoth in the industry and new guns and ammo sold pretty well.
It didn't take long for the ever-cynical shooting community to unleash its own torrent of hyperbole. I was told point blank by a savvy rifleman that the cartridge was doomed to obscurity and cash spent on such a rifle was practically flushed. Work with a chronograph soon revealed that Winchester's data had a bit of "blue sky" in it as well (not the first time for that one either) and most folks with production guns with 24" barrels were getting 2900 fps and a bit of change with the 180gr bullets, far short of the promised 3100 fps. Most folks who pulled the trigger on one got belted with enough recoil to make claims of "reduced recoil" sound like the complete rubbish it is. According to a number of Internet Bwanas, the rebated rim practically guaranteed your mauling at the paws of charismatic megafauna when your gun jammed. Some early rifle had feeding issues that did nothing to alleviate those concerns either.
In those days, you could log into your favorite forum or BBS (remember that!) and read pages of technical minutiae from both sides and when Winchester introduced their follow on family of short cartridges in .270, 7mm, and .325, as well as Remington's competing "short mags".... things kinda went tilt. Suddenly the market had a glut of cartridges that all, pretty much, did the exact same thing.
What both sides of the debate missed was pretty much everything.
I came along to the .300WSM in 2006, when I (somewhat reluctantly) purchased a rifle I was in love with. My rifle was a lightweight.... a 6.5 pound rifle for carrying into high and rocky places. I wanted something with enough oomph for the odd grizzly or moose and with enough reach for Dall sheep and caribou over open country. Ammo was fairly expensive compared to .30-06 fodder, but in all reality- most hunters just don't shoot their rifles all that much and with recoil numbers in the 25-29 foot pound range...don't really want to.
A string of dead critters later and the .300WSM did not disappoint. Since then, every big game animal I've taken with one exception has been with the cartridge. I've now had 3 of the WSM family and just recently purchased a Winchester 7WSM for eventual custom work. My favorite rifle shoots 180 grain bullets into 3/4" at 2925fps with boring regularity. None of the WSM rifles I've had exhibited feeding issues and every one of my acquaintances who have WSMs do not regret the purchase. They just happily head to the field and kill stuff.
While it may sound like I'm a fanboy, I'm not. The cartridge is, what it is- nothing less or more. A very effective cartridge that gets near .300 Win Magnum performance in a handy sized short action rifle. It's now 15 years old and pretty near ubiquitous on sporting good retailer's shelves and cataloged by almost everyone making guns and ammunition. I expect that it will not be teetering on obsolescence any time soon. It's not magic either- it's just a brass bottle for holding gunpowder and a pretty good one at that.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






